{"id":1543,"date":"2011-01-13T09:05:47","date_gmt":"2011-01-13T14:05:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/?p=1543"},"modified":"2011-01-13T09:05:47","modified_gmt":"2011-01-13T14:05:47","slug":"senator-lugar-response-to-my-query","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/2011\/01\/13\/senator-lugar-response-to-my-query\/","title":{"rendered":"Senator Lugar response to my query"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject: \u00a0Term Limits and Salary<\/p>\n<div>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Dear Mr.  Moore:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Thank you for  contacting me.\u00a0 I appreciate this opportunity to respond and noted your comments  concerning congressional pay, retirement benefits, and term limits, among other  issues.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Congress is charged with making  final decisions regarding its pay by Article I; Section 6 of the Constitution.\u00a0  I have long believed that the system would be improved if an external commission  were making decisions, or at least recommendations, on congressional  compensation including pay, pension and benefits.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Under law, virtually all  government beneficiaries, retirees, and workers receive an automatic annual Cost  of Living Adjustment (COLA).\u00a0 This includes Social Security recipients, retired  federal workers, retired military, and current federal workers.\u00a0 In 1989,  Congress made a bipartisan decision to include itself in this COLA process.\u00a0 It  simultaneously imposed stricter limits on outside earned income and banned  members from accepting so-called &#8220;honoraria&#8221; &#8212; payments from groups for  speeches or articles.\u00a0 This reform package, which was supported by Common Cause  and some other government watchdog groups, was intended to prevent corruption  and reduce the politicization of congressional salaries.\u00a0 Members would get an  automatic COLA like all other federal workers, but there would be far less  opportunity for potentially corrupting outside earned income or ad hoc pay  raises.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> <\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Congress recently  enacted legislation which\u00a0blocks the  automatic COLA for Members of Congress from going into effect for  2010.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> The conundrum  facing congressional COLA is clearly two-fold.\u00a0 On the one hand, it is  important, from a recruitment standpoint, to maintain salary parity with the  private and public sectors.\u00a0 I have been involved in the recruitment of  candidates for many years, and I can attest that a large pay discrepancy between  the private sector and public service will only encourage two types of  candidates: millionaires who want to dabble in politics and lifetime politicians  who have not made a living in any other way.\u00a0 On the other hand, compensation  that is perceived as too generous risks the appearance of special privilege and  fails to set the proper example of fiscal responsibility.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Through a  commission or other means, we must thoughtfully balance the important goal of  frugality with the need to attract the best possible candidates and a broad  spectrum of professions to congressional service.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Furthermore, since 1984, all  members of Congress have been required to participate in the Social Security  system and pay Social Security and Medicare taxes.\u00a0 Congressional participation  in Social Security was mandated in 1983, when Congress passed a bipartisan bill  restructuring Social Security and extending the  program&#8217;s  solvency.\u00a0 I voted in favor of that bill.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> It  is often erroneously said that members of Congress pay nothing\u00a0toward their own retirement.\u00a0 In fact, members of Congress pay more of their  salaries into their retirement than other federal workers.\u00a0 Members of Congress  in the pre-1984 CSRS retirement system pay 8 percent of their gross salary into  the pension plan.\u00a0 On top of that, they pay Social Security taxes.\u00a0 Other  federal workers who are in CSRS pay 7 percent of their gross salary into the  pension plan.\u00a0 But unlike members of Congress, they are exempt from Social  Security.\u00a0 Members of Congress who are covered by the post-1984 FERS retirement  system pay 1.3 percent of their gross salary into the plan, plus Social Security  taxes.\u00a0 Other federal workers pay 0.8 percent of their gross salary into FERS,  plus Social Security taxes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Pensions vary greatly depending  on time of service and contributions.\u00a0 Obviously, those members still covered by  the older CSRS system who paid 8 percent of their salary into their retirement  receive\u00a0more than  members who have paid 1.3 percent per year in the post-1984 FERS  retirement system.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Knowing your  interest in fiscal discipline, I am pleased to report that I have returned more  than $5 million in unspent office funds during the course of my career.\u00a0 I  believe that it is important to run an efficient office and to make good use of  taxpayer dollars.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> On a final topic, I have not  been a supporter of term limit proposals because I believe they would limit the  choices of voters, expand the influence of unelected bureaucrats and lobbyists,  and deprive Congress of an element of historical experience that is important in  current policy debates.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Term limits would place a  restriction on the right of individual American voters to choose whomever they  wish to serve in Congress.\u00a0 The only limits the Framers of the Constitution  placed on that choice were age and citizenship.\u00a0 Not only would term limits  tamper with the Constitution, they would imply that the American voter is  incapable of telling the difference between a bad representative and a good  one.\u00a0 I believe that we should trust the judgments made by the American people  when they go to the polls to vote.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> I also believe that  term limits would have unintended side effects that could result in a less  accountable government.\u00a0 Those members with the least experience tend to be the  ones who are most dependent on advice and information regarding the legislative  process.\u00a0 To the degree that term limits reduce experience in Congress, they  would enhance the relative influence of those people who provide such advice and  information: congressional staff, executive branch bureaucrats, and lobbyists  who are in place in\u00a0Washington in unelected and often permanent positions.\u00a0 I do not  think advocates of term limits are seeking this outcome, but this would be one  likely result of term limits.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Further, I believe there is  value in having some members who served in government during notable events of  our recent history.\u00a0 Often such events are relevant to the problems before  us.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Thank you, again, for contacting me.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> Sincerely,<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Richard  G. Lugar<br \/>\nUnited  States Senator<\/p>\n<p>RGL\/cga<\/p>\n<p>Do you receive The Lugar Letter? Send an  email to newsletter@lugar.senate.gov to stay current with Senator Lugar&#8217;s  activities.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject: \u00a0Term Limits and Salary Dear Mr. Moore: Thank you for contacting me.\u00a0 I appreciate this opportunity to respond and noted your comments concerning congressional pay, retirement benefits, and term limits, among other issues. Congress is charged with making final decisions regarding its pay by Article I; Section 6 of the Constitution.\u00a0 I have long [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1543"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1544,"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543\/revisions\/1544"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.charleswmoore.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}